Since the world has turned, people have been bickering and disagreeing with each other. Consider college sports rivalry, two schools in the same state turn locals against each other. A country becomes divided once every four years when the presidential election is divided between two major political parties. Or even in a high school on spirit day, when you have students from each grade level competing against each other. It really doesn’t matter the location, gender, or ethnicity, as disagreement and competition are an innate part of human nature.
Friendly competition and disagreement is just fine. As is a disagreement of sorts between two colleagues, after all the conclusion should benefit their employer. However, a heated agreement between two disagreeing parties can sometimes result in an unfortunate lawsuit. Be it a liability suit against a major pharmaceutical company, or a smaller suit between two conflicting neighbors, a lawsuit wastes both time and money. Regardless, if we have a disagreement with another party, and money is a factor, how are we to resolve it?
The latter question raises a valid point. After all, if the disagreement involves money then only fair way to solve it is through a court issued judgment. Or at least that’s what most people think. The courts are a publicly funded entity, there to serve the best interest of the people. If the court cases warrants it, a jury of your peers will at times be involved as well. The judge and jury are the deciders of the case, or suit, and their decision is final. They take away power and control of the situation and they make a judgment on what they believe to be real and true. This is a distinct disadvantage for many people, and is truly the point that makes a mediator so valuable. There are several companies that specialize in mediation, like the one found at http://www.globalmediation.co.uk/. Mediation is an unbiased method of solving a dispute between two parties. They are not there to favor one over the other, rather they search out an amicable solution that will solve the problems of both parties in a fair and equitable way. It’s no secret that money is often a touchy subject, and these companies can sometimes find ways to settle disputes with compromises outside of financial means. Last, but certainly not least, collecting on a judgment tends to be very difficult because the liable party often will do their best to delay paying out the funds. A mediated compromise is more favorable to both parties, in which case they can pay out after an agreement is reached.
